To accurately declare someone a terrorist we must be able to clearly define what terrorism is. The United States government defines terrorism as “[An] act of terrorism, means any activity that (A) involves a violent act or an act dangerous to human life that is a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or of any State; and (B) appears to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping.”

Based on the official definition lets examine a few cases and determine if the media has been fair in labeling terrorists. Timothy McVeigh, the alleged Oklahoma City bomber, in an interview with TIME magazine shared his views on our government. Whether it was the feeling of being betrayed when he went to war or the unfair taxation of America’s citizens he displayed his dissatisfaction with the government. If McVeigh is truly guilty of the bombing then one would conclude that his objective would have been to express his angst and coerce the government to change. By definition this would have been an act of terrorism but In 2008 Pennsylvania’s Homeland Security director, James Powers, said that McVeigh is not a terrorist just very angry with the government. The dude just blew up a federal building and killed at least 168 people.

In 2001 many people were afraid to open their mail due to the threat of it being laced with anthrax. United States capital buildings and postal services were shut down for cleaning; I would describe that as affecting the conduct of government. I believe at least 5 people were killed so these mailing were an act dangerous to human life and a violation of criminal law, but the alleged suspect Bruce Ivins was never described as a terrorist. Anthrax is a bio-warfare agent; I still have flashbacks when exposed to white powdery substances
Lets consider Scott Roeder the guy who confessed to killing Dr. George Tiller. Dr. Tiller provided abortions which by law are legal. Mr. Roeder felt the abortions that Tiller performed were unlawful and therefore plotted to kill him to protect children. Roeder considered chopping off Tiller’s hands, hitting him with a car, and even breaking into his home to kill him. Scott Roeder decided to run up a church a shoot Dr. Tiller. Consider the horror the other church members witnessed and the grief Dr. Tiller’s family suffered. Roeder took the life of a man who performed a legal action that he disagreed with. He violated criminal law and intended to intimidate a civilian population and possibly influence government policy relating to abortion; by definition that is terrorism.

Recently an Alabama University staff member allegedly murdered three of her colleagues. Amy Bishop was arrested for shooting her colleagues after learning that she would not be tenured. She also shot and killed her brother when she was 19 and was a suspect in a pipe bombing investigation. She allegedly attempted to bomb a Harvard professor’s home that was evaluating her on doctoral work. She and Dr. Paul Rosenburg were known to not get along. Once again imagine the horror her colleagues that survived witnessed. Imagine the terror Dr. Rosengurg’s family experienced when they discovered the double pipe bombed Bishop mailed. She committed a crime in violation of criminal law and I feel intended to coerce a civilian population with the pipe bomb incident; by definition she’s a terrorist.

On February 18, 2010 Joe Stack decided to burn down his home and fly a plane into an Austin, Texas IRS building. I have read the so-called Kamikaze pilot’s suicide note that was removed from the internet by the FBI. In his letter he discussed his disgust for the government largely due to the unfair taxation of the citizens and lack of representation as well. He went on to share his experiences with the IRS which he blames for his financial misfortune. Joe Stack fundamentally disagreed with the federal government and felt his voice was not being heard. He reached out to his local representatives and felt that he was being ignored. To be heard and possibly impact the government’s policies related to taxation Stack became a suicide bomber by igniting his plane when it crashed into the IRS building. According to the official definition of terrorism Joe Stack is a terrorist.

I must also consider the actions of the Ku Klux Klan in America. When African Americans were given the right to vote Klansmen used many tactics to coerce these citizens not to vote. When African Americans spoke out against the atrocities of the KKK and southern politicians that violated human rights they were terrorized. Lets consider the Birmingham Church bombing, the lynchings, the brutal violence the Klan and other white Americans unleashed on African Americans. The Klan used violence as a means of coercion and violated US criminal laws so by definition these cowards were terrorists.

Why was the mainstream media so reluctant to label these suspects as terrorist? On September 11, 2001 Al Qaeda allegedly flew planes into the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon; they were labeled terrorist. In late December of 2009 Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab allegedly attempted to blow up a flight that landed in Detroit with a bomb in his briefs. The boxer bomber was labeled a terrorist. Even when some people do not cause harm to civilians the press and government officials are swift to label them as terrorists. Lets consider the seven men who were arrested in Miami, Florida in 2006. The FBI said that this group planned to blow up Sears Tower but several raids did not yield any explosives or weapons. Five out of the seven men where US citizens just like, Roeder, Stack, Bishop, Ivins, & McVeigh; the difference is these men did not harm one soul but yet were labeled homegrown terrorists.

I do not intended to determine who is a terrorist and who is not, that is not my purpose. I only intend to present the definition of terrorism, some cases in which American lives were lost, and point out when officials and the media choose to use the term terrorist to describe people. It is overwhelmingly one sided. It appears from my observation that the term terrorist is most often applied to those who are non white. When white Americans terrorize United States citizens they are described as depressed, strange, loners, insane, but seldom described as terrorists. I wish to leave you with a question; WHY?

Dr. Welsing redefined racism and he approach totally changes the concept as we know it. Her definition of racism is:
“the local and global power system structured and maintained by those who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined; this system consists of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action, and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity. The ultimate purpose of the system is to prevent white genetic annihilation on Earth- a planet in which the overwhelming majority of people are classified as non-white by white skinned people. All of the non- white people are genetically dominant (in terms of skin coloration) compared to the genetically recessive white skinned people”

Dr. Welsing suggests that white skinned people’s claims of superiority are the result of the realization of their genetic inferiority and their fear of genetic annihilation. Racism white supremacy was consciously or subconsciously created to maintain or conserve white people’s status on the planet. The concept of race was created by whites in an attempt to propagate the illusion that they were the majority on the planet. Whites as a collective are classified racially as white/Caucasian, but the remaining non-white population is fragmented into several racial categories. This gives the white race the ability to appear as the majority when they actually are the minority. The reality is the there are only two types of people on the planet those who have the ability to produce color and those who cannot. One group of the non-white population has the ability to produce all the degrees of skin pigmentation and that is the so-called Black race. As it pertains to skin color the so-called Black race is the most dominant and is the greatest threat to white genetic survival. When we look at the system of racism white supremacy we will find that some the most heinous atrocities have been afflicted upon the Black race possibly due the Black race’s genetic dominance.

John Mayer’s comments reflect a racial attitude and also show his insecurities as well. I will only touch on his comments in reference to sex and relationships with women who would be classified as Black according to the system created by whites. I do not desire to touch the comment in which he referred to a “hood pass” as a “nigger pass”. Mayer discussed his enjoyment of masturbation, porn, and even tongue kissing an openly homosexual male. Mayer’s sexual behavior relates to Dr. Welsing’s suggests that non-whites despise their genes. They hate their genes because their offspring remind them of their genetic inferiority. Whites cannot produce skin pigmentation; the very thing they desire the most. Sexual behaviors that are predominantly practiced by whites reflect their self hate and blatant disregard for the sacredness of the process of reproduction. John Mayer loves to masturbate, does not want to be married or have children, and swapped spit with a gay dude. John hates his genes, he knows that he cannot produce offspring with the traits he subconsciously desires. Masturbation and homosexuality definitely cannot produce offspring. These behaviors allow for the pleasure of the sex act but do not allow for reproduction to occur. His unwillingness to be married and his lack of desire validates my claim.

It was Mayer’s comments in regards to Black women that caused the most controversy. In his interview with Playboy Mayer said “I don’t think I open myself to it. My dick is sort of like a white supremacist. I’ve got a Benetton heart and a fuckin’ David Duke cock. I’m going to start dating separately from my dick” when asked if Black women threw themselves at him. He then added “I always thought Holly Robinson Peete was gorgeous. Every white dude loved Hilary from The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. And Kerry Washington. She’s superhot, and she’s also white-girl crazy. Kerry Washington would break your heart like a white girl. Just all of a sudden she’d be like, “Yeah, I sucked his dick. Whatever.” And you’d be like, “What? We weren’t talking about that.” That’s what “Heartbreak Warfare” is all about, when a girl uses jealousy as a tactic” when pressed about what Black women he would consider. His remarks display the internal conflict that racists have. He referred to his penis as David Duke. David Duke was the Grand Wizard of the KKK. Mayer fears sexual relationships with Black women because they give him feelings of inadequacy and powerlessness. In his subconscious he knows that her genes will dominate his therefore rendering him inferiority as it relates to skin color. The interesting thing here is that John also subconsciously wants to have a sexual encounter with a Black woman because it gives him the illusion of being able to produce color; the very power he desires but cannot have. Dr. Welsing defines this dynamic as reaction formation; In which someone turns what they desire into something the despise. We must also take note of the comment he made in reference to Kerry Washington in which he talked about her performing fellatio. Fellatio is a form of masturbation does not produce offspring,

In conclusion I suggest, like many others, that John Mayer is racist but only as it pertains to Dr. Welsing’s definition of racism white supremacy. Mayer is aware of his inferiority as it relates to pigmentation. His inferiority complex has produced feelings of inadequacy and disgust for his genes. He enjoys masturbation, homosexual experiences, and does not want to be married because of his reluctance to produce offspring that would only remind him of his recessive genes. He avoids relationships with Black women because it would make him feel inadequate and powerless. He also simultaneously wants a sexual encounter with a Black woman because it would give him the illusion of having the ability to produce color which he really desires.

I recently had a love one get deployed to fight TERROR in Afghanistan. It was one of the most painful experiences of my life. Knowing that my childhood hero would be placed in harm’s way to further the global dominance of the so called ELITE angers me. During the deployment ceremony local politicians spoke further propagating the over exaggeration of the threat to humanity in America and the lasted breaches in airport security, while knowing that this fiasco is for the benefit of the corporations and international bankers. If you do not know this I suggest that you read a book entitled “War is a Racket” by General Smedley Butler. Knowing about the deliberate creation of conflict throughout the world for the dominance of a few on the many makes it very hard to support these wars. At the same time I wish my loved one and his comrades all the success in the world. I know that success may come with causalities but I want my loved one to return in the same many in which he left. I am in full support of our troops. They are the most courageous people on the planet, especially with many of them knowing what these wars are all about. They still honor their oath and fight so that we may not have to.

When you think about it supporting the troops but opposing the war is like an oxymoron. Partly because all the things you oppose about war will be carried out by the troops you support. It’s like deploying your loved ones is a sick way in getting you to support the war. The soldiers’ success means that the corporatists’ and the international bankers’ agenda will be furthered. It is time for Americans to wake up and put pressure on these lobbyist funded politicians. Lets expose to everyone who is really behind this war on terror. I have been outspoken against the war before, but now they have taken a GIANT in my family and we must turn up the heat so that your GIANT will not be sent to war.

WAKE UP people the war on terror is an attempt to control the resources in so called under developed countries. If you control the resources you control the people. Just consider the frequency in the use of the term world governance by our political leaders. Also look at the latest restrictions on our freedoms here in America all for our national security. The war on terror is fought to gain more control over the melanated peoples’ resources in the East and in Africa. Wake up Americans wake up.

www.termainebelote.com

www.rewired.ning.com

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/rewired-radio1

There are so many things out here that are obstacles to anyone trying to become conscious and the last obstacle you need is your spouse. I build with a few brothers daily and our conversations somehow always end up being about our significant others. While we are improving our overall life with changes in our diet, spiritual practice, decisions, mentality, and approach to relationships, we wish to share the benefits of such changes with the ones we so dearly love. It seems that we are constantly met with resistance from family members and especially our spouses.

I can understand the resistance due to traditional paralysis and the fear mongering that keeps one trapped mentally and especially spiritually. Too many of us are afraid to break away from the traditions of our immediate ancestors in the areas of religion and diet. Many of us cannot make the correlation between the lifestyle our American ancestors lived and who they learned their customs from. We are unable to see that our Standard American Diet, (which will only leave your sick, angry, and depressed) and our religions (which scare you into belief) where taught to us by the very same people who dehumanized us. Only a fool will believe that these monsters had our well being in mind when they forced us to assimilate in their degenerate culture.

When presented with the facts about how our current culture is what is limiting us from becoming super humans many still decide to not change. The only thing constant in life is change so nothing stays the same. You are either getting better or worse and if you are still living like the monsters who enslaved your ancestors then you are getting worse. It can be difficult at times when you are on your way to righteousness and your spouse is comatose.

Since I presented the dilemma it is only fair to attempt to give some solutions. Solution number one; know who and what you are and what you want in a spouse before you enter any relationship. This is the best solution to this problem. I was not taught this and I am sure many more were not either. If you are already with the one you love and feel like you do not want to cut and run I have a few solutions as well. Number one is to realize that you cannot change anyone who is not willing to change themselves. This realization will alleviate a lot of stress and frustration. Number two is to live by example and do not turn back. When your spouse begins to see the benefits of your lifestyle changes they may become motivated to change. Number three is to practice what you preach at all times; those who are observing you cannot wait to throw your shortcomings in your face. And number four is to CUT & RUN. If you feel like your spouse is affecting your ability to grow then you got to go. To become a conscious super human that we were designed to be you must eliminate all things that keep you bound and sometimes those things are the ones we love.

www.termainebelote.com
www.rewired.ning.com

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/rewired-radio1